<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Dave Britzius&#039; Computer Hardware - Graphics, Gaming &amp; CAD - Cape Town</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davebritzius.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davebritzius.com</link>
	<description>Computer Hardware for Demanding Applications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 15:12:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Solid State Drives vs Mechanical Hard Drives &#8211; The real world difference by George</title>
		<link>http://www.davebritzius.com/solid-state-drives-vs-mechanical-drives-the-real-world-difference#comment-862</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 15:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davebritzius.com/?p=586#comment-862</guid>
		<description>Hi thanks for the test... was wondering if you did it on 60 or 120gb SSD? because the 60&amp;80gb share the same componenets and the 120gb use different chips which prove to be even faster almost 90% compared to 60 and 80gb ssd&#039;s 

i&#039;m still on the mechanical HDD&#039;s opened photoshop cs5 and time was roughly 3 seconds ... opened autocad 2012 time was roughly 15 seconds.... i&#039;m thinking maybe the cpu or ram also contributes to make a difference as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi thanks for the test&#8230; was wondering if you did it on 60 or 120gb SSD? because the 60&amp;80gb share the same componenets and the 120gb use different chips which prove to be even faster almost 90% compared to 60 and 80gb ssd&#8217;s </p>
<p>i&#8217;m still on the mechanical HDD&#8217;s opened photoshop cs5 and time was roughly 3 seconds &#8230; opened autocad 2012 time was roughly 15 seconds&#8230;. i&#8217;m thinking maybe the cpu or ram also contributes to make a difference as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Solid State Drives vs Mechanical Hard Drives &#8211; The real world difference by Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.davebritzius.com/solid-state-drives-vs-mechanical-drives-the-real-world-difference#comment-691</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 12:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davebritzius.com/?p=586#comment-691</guid>
		<description>Yes, Russel,
The some of the latest SSD&#039;s come out with both SATA and USB3 interfaces.

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Russel,<br />
The some of the latest SSD&#8217;s come out with both SATA and USB3 interfaces.</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Solid State Drives vs Mechanical Hard Drives &#8211; The real world difference by Russel</title>
		<link>http://www.davebritzius.com/solid-state-drives-vs-mechanical-drives-the-real-world-difference#comment-673</link>
		<dc:creator>Russel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 12:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davebritzius.com/?p=586#comment-673</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info, I am building another PC for myself, and with your info, I will use a 120GB SSD. It makes sense to have the OS boot off what is essentially a flash drive, much quicker.
I see SSD&#039;s come with a SATA interface. Will they come out in USB3 too?
Thanks again, your research is very helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info, I am building another PC for myself, and with your info, I will use a 120GB SSD. It makes sense to have the OS boot off what is essentially a flash drive, much quicker.<br />
I see SSD&#8217;s come with a SATA interface. Will they come out in USB3 too?<br />
Thanks again, your research is very helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

